<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>sci.math Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math</link>
  <description>Mathematical discussions and pursuits.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: *** *** Re: India - beggar nation, biggest recipient of foreign aid ever</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/2328f3fe4ab3daef/4a85c7d35265cca3?show_docid=4a85c7d35265cca3</link>
  <description>
  He does need reassurance from you. &lt;br&gt; Any one as great a genius as your woof woof friend? If you point one &lt;br&gt; out the self proclaime greatest genius of all time on this planet &lt;br&gt; (very likely he will correct &amp;quot;this planet&amp;quot; by &amp;quot;whole universe&amp;quot;). &lt;br&gt; Did your friend ever tell you why he is trying to publish his theory
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/2328f3fe4ab3daef/4a85c7d35265cca3?show_docid=4a85c7d35265cca3</guid>
  <author>
  josh...@gmail.com
  (Romanise)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:19:07 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The mafia - open your eyes</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/2f48e6574de6e516/0ff37118c120bdd9?show_docid=0ff37118c120bdd9</link>
  <description>
  A decimal point. &lt;br&gt; /BAH
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/2f48e6574de6e516/0ff37118c120bdd9?show_docid=0ff37118c120bdd9</guid>
  <author>
  jmfbah...@aol
  (jmfbahciv)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:31:54 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>CERN LHC lawsuit was not accepted for decision by German Constitutional Court</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/78b3c5d0df81f34e/ac9bafd6005ad6a0?show_docid=ac9bafd6005ad6a0</link>
  <description>
  Quote from &amp;quot;LHC Kritik / LHC Critique&amp;quot; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://lhc-concern.info/?page_id=91&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; CERN LHC lawsuit was not accepted for decision by German &lt;br&gt; Constitutional Court &lt;br&gt; The German Institutional Court today has refused to accept an appeal &lt;br&gt; for interim measures to limit LHC energies at 1 TeV per beam. This &lt;br&gt; means that the case was not accepted for decision by the court and
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/78b3c5d0df81f34e/ac9bafd6005ad6a0?show_docid=ac9bafd6005ad6a0</guid>
  <author>
  magnetic.t...@yandex.ua
  (Magnetic)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:03:15 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Top 10 living mathematicians (or recently living)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/8a771801bf481dec/9f40f64aeb8916ae?show_docid=9f40f64aeb8916ae</link>
  <description>
  [snip] &lt;br&gt; As far as sci.math is concerned, I would give the virtual hat to Robert, with my &lt;br&gt; apologies to all the rest mentioned. &lt;br&gt; He possesses some of the best properties in the tradition of the Ancients: &lt;br&gt; He is humble, silent, quick, efficient, optimal, helpful, non-boasting, very &lt;br&gt; slow to anger, non-show off, non-judgmental, patient, open-minded, honest, not
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/8a771801bf481dec/9f40f64aeb8916ae?show_docid=9f40f64aeb8916ae</guid>
  <author>
  morph...@olympus.mons
  (I.N. Galidakis)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:47:43 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: JSH: Depressing reality, prime reality</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/e6b85bb778e88674?show_docid=e6b85bb778e88674</link>
  <description>
  To be honest, I cannot follow all of your logic here. For example, why &lt;br&gt; have you guys suddenly started talking about the &amp;quot;mod 4&amp;quot; case only? &lt;br&gt; Isn&#39;t this result true for all N, and not just for N = 4? &lt;br&gt; Let me understand what you told me: the &amp;quot;JSH conjecture&amp;quot; has been &lt;br&gt; proven long time ago. That is, it is a simple corollary to the
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/e6b85bb778e88674?show_docid=e6b85bb778e88674</guid>
  <author>
  ostap_bender_1...@hotmail.com
  (Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr.)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:48:48 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: bh, lhc</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/78b3c5d0df81f34e/c2aabf132a98d8c0?show_docid=c2aabf132a98d8c0</link>
  <description>
  I&#39;ve now finished reading that and I think there&#39;s some &lt;br&gt; common sense in there. &lt;br&gt; For example, a coal mine operation was near a railroad line. &lt;br&gt; The railroad operators said that there was a small chance of &lt;br&gt; a landslide. The coal mine would say there&#39;s a very small &lt;br&gt; chance of a landslide (or something like that).
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/78b3c5d0df81f34e/c2aabf132a98d8c0?show_docid=c2aabf132a98d8c0</guid>
  <author>
  david...@videotron.ca
  (David Bernier)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:35:57 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: JSH: Depressing reality, prime reality</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/7884704e4ffadb29?show_docid=7884704e4ffadb29</link>
  <description>
  True in the standard model. Whether this means &amp;quot;true&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; is an interesting question. If GC is undecidable then &lt;br&gt; it is &amp;quot;true&amp;quot; in exactly the same way that the Goedel &lt;br&gt; sentence is true. &lt;br&gt; - William Hughes
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/7884704e4ffadb29?show_docid=7884704e4ffadb29</guid>
  <author>
  wpihug...@hotmail.com
  (William Hughes)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:34:44 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: The definition of Ordinals</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/0f5add0f855932ab/0db172ad2861aeb7?show_docid=0db172ad2861aeb7</link>
  <description>
  {{{}}} satisfy all the above, but it is not an ordinal! &lt;br&gt; Zuhair
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/0f5add0f855932ab/0db172ad2861aeb7?show_docid=0db172ad2861aeb7</guid>
  <author>
  zaljo...@gmail.com
  (zuhair)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:17:02 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: &#39;When Are Relations Neither True Nor False?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/cbb719ff5311e60f/19f6e6c4968181c1?show_docid=19f6e6c4968181c1</link>
  <description>
  Nam Nguyen says... &lt;br&gt; &lt;p&gt;Give an example of a nontrivial theorem in such a system. I don&#39;t &lt;br&gt; think anyone would be interested in it, not even you.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/cbb719ff5311e60f/19f6e6c4968181c1?show_docid=19f6e6c4968181c1</guid>
  <author>
  stevendaryl3...@yahoo.com
  (Daryl McCullough)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:01:02 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: &#39;When Are Relations Neither True Nor False?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/cbb719ff5311e60f/ec082c2a6be99b93?show_docid=ec082c2a6be99b93</link>
  <description>
  Nam Nguyen says... &lt;br&gt; The beauty of mathematical proof is that you can be certain &lt;br&gt; of the truth of a universal statement without checking every &lt;br&gt; instance.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/cbb719ff5311e60f/ec082c2a6be99b93?show_docid=ec082c2a6be99b93</guid>
  <author>
  stevendaryl3...@yahoo.com
  (Daryl McCullough)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:58:45 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: MADNESS IN EINSTEINIANA</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/1d4df0cc7085dd35/dbc78605626492f0?show_docid=dbc78605626492f0</link>
  <description>
  &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.salem-news.com/articles/june232009/einstein_lessons_dj_6-22-09.php&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; &amp;quot;For those of us who believe in physics, this separation between past, &lt;br&gt; present and future is only an illusion, however tenacious&amp;quot; - Albert &lt;br&gt; Einstein &lt;br&gt; So forces (e.g. a bird born in 2032) constantly &amp;quot;travel back in time &lt;br&gt; to sabotage the collider&amp;quot;, and this gloriously confirms Divine
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/1d4df0cc7085dd35/dbc78605626492f0?show_docid=dbc78605626492f0</guid>
  <author>
  pva...@yahoo.com
  (Pentcho Valev)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:48:04 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: For the person who has everything, a bottle to keep it in.</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/570eefa45a0f851e/b8dd6e37512c8d75?show_docid=b8dd6e37512c8d75</link>
  <description>
  On 10 Mar 2010 00:22:05 -0800, R H Draney &amp;lt;dadoc...@spamcop.net&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; No can do. She&#39;s in another dimension.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/570eefa45a0f851e/b8dd6e37512c8d75?show_docid=b8dd6e37512c8d75</guid>
  <author>
  chri...@eircom.net
  (Chuck Riggs)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:31:04 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Top 10 living mathematicians (or recently living)</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/8a771801bf481dec/a340a9d024ca66a1?show_docid=a340a9d024ca66a1</link>
  <description>
  On Mar 5, 2:22 am, riderofgiraffes &amp;lt;mathforum.org...@solipsys.co. uk&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Newton? Leibniz? Kolmogorov? Euler? Cauchy? Pascal? Riemann? &lt;br&gt; Not in the same league. &lt;br&gt; Let me start our own S&amp;amp;M (sci.math) list of Top Ten mathematicians of &lt;br&gt; all times: &lt;br&gt; 1. JSH &lt;br&gt; 2. Inverse 19 &lt;br&gt; 3. EEE
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/8a771801bf481dec/a340a9d024ca66a1?show_docid=a340a9d024ca66a1</guid>
  <author>
  ostap_bender_1...@hotmail.com
  (Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr.)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:27:13 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: JSH: Depressing reality, prime reality</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/91893fc2f89ee8e7?show_docid=91893fc2f89ee8e7</link>
  <description>
  Standard theorists don&#39;t *wonder* whether GC is true if undecidable. &lt;br&gt; If GC is undecidable, then it is true (no scare quotes needed). This &lt;br&gt; is an obvious fact. &lt;br&gt; (Maybe the claim about RH is just as obvious, but I&#39;m don&#39;t know much &lt;br&gt; about RH.)
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/91893fc2f89ee8e7?show_docid=91893fc2f89ee8e7</guid>
  <author>
  je...@phiwumbda.org
  (Jesse F. Hughes)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:23:09 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: JSH: Depressing reality, prime reality</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/23bcf2c652392c3c?show_docid=23bcf2c652392c3c</link>
  <description>
  On Mar 9, 6:00 am, mstem...@walkabout.empros.com (Michael Stemper) &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; No, no, no. There will be no theorem-proving any longer. All theorems &lt;br&gt; will be proved by declaring them &amp;quot;new axioms&amp;quot;. &lt;br&gt; In fact, they will add both these theorems AND their negations to the &lt;br&gt; set of axioms. The more - the merrier!
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.la/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/f3febeccd0421084/23bcf2c652392c3c?show_docid=23bcf2c652392c3c</guid>
  <author>
  ostap_bender_1...@hotmail.com
  (Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr.)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:12:42 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
