Newsgroups: sci.math
From: Hatto von Aquitanien <ab...@AugiaDives.hre>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 01:54:29 -0400
Local: Sat, Jun 16 2007 12:54 pm
Subject: Re: Real Valued and Alternative Definition of Metrics
markw...@yahoo.com wrote: I'm not sure what you mean. Which article? > On Jun 11, 2:57 pm, Hatto von Aquitanien <a...@AugiaDives.hre> wrote: >> This, however, tells me that I could define a metric as a rational-valued >> function: >> http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/AlternativeDefinitionOfMetricSpace... >> Is there any fundamental problem in doing so in order to enable the > That article you said you were going to read sometime later? > The That's not the part I was asking about. Almost every definition of "metric > answer was sitting right there. A metric space is any space such that > every two points A, B has a distance AB, such that > (1) AA = 0 > (2) AB > 0 if A, B are distinct points > (3) AB = BA > (4) AB + BC >= AC. > Now, for rationals, A, B take the distance AB to be the absolute value > Is (1) true? |A-A| = 0. Yes. > To see, by the way, that the latter equality |A+C-2B| > |A-C| *does* > Thus, the rationals with this distance function satisfies the defining space" I have found requires that the metric be a real-valued function. It has been suggested that I can't talk about metrics and Cauchy sequences until I have defined the real numbers. But then the question arrises: how do I define real numbers using fundamental sequences? -- http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1ek5w_wtc7-the-smoking-gun-of-911-u... http://911research.wtc7.net http://vehme.blogspot.com Virtus Tutissima Cassis You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||